Labels:book | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane OCR: mine whether seizure is appropriate under the provi- sions of the [federal] statutes. 116 U.S at 679 The court of appeals sought to distinguish Calero- Totedo on the ground that there the property was moveable, while here it is not Pet. App. 14a-15a The Court Catero-Toledo, however, simply identi- fied as one of the three relevant factors, that Did, seizure notice and hearing might frustrate the in- terests served by the [forfeiture] statutes, since the property seized a5 here vacht -will often be sort that could be removed another jurisdiction, destroyed or concealed, advance warning con- fiseation were given. U.S af 679. The Court did not suggest that was necessary for the govern- ment show that removal, concea Iment. or destruc- tion the property was likely particular case before seizur ...
(.png)
